Afghanistan
Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Broader Middle East
China
Europe
India
Iran
Iraq
Israel / Palestine
Japan
Koreas
NATO
Pakistan
Russia
Terror
Other


Democracy
Energy Security
Environment
Human Rights
Peace and Conflict
Religion and Politics
Tolerance
Other


Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Europe
Greater Middle East
Latin America
Russia


EU
NATO
OSCE
UN




During the Munich Security Conference, it became obvious that the major powers still disagree over how to deal with Iran.
What is your view?

Follow China’s example and opt for more negotiations
Iran is simply buying time again
Tougher sanctions are needed – with or without UN support
Military options should be pursued

Submit   Previous Polls

Lebanon's Ex-President Emile Lahoud explains exclusively: "We are in a State of War with Israel"
written by: Manuela Paraipan, 25-Jan-09

Former Lebanese President Emile Lahoud (left) with Syria's President Bashar al-Assad: "The Syrians know that I am not pro-Syrian. I am a nationalist."
Manuela Paraipan:
What are the few crucial moments that you can recall during your time as President of Lebanon and are willing to speak of?

Emile Lahoud: There were more than a few such moments, during 18 years, because I was Commander in Chief for nine years and President for nine years. As a commander, there were many, but I will tell you the most important.

At the beginning, nobody wanted to mix the brigades that were organized according to religious sects. When I was appointed there was a Maronite brigade, a Sunni brigade, a Druze brigade and so on. There are 18 official sects in Lebanon and there were 12 brigades.

From the start, I had problems with those who were politically responsible who said that we just went out of the civil war, and if we make the change they will kill each other. I said that if we treat them right, it would work. And it worked. And that's how the army became national. As president there were many important moments, but this time they were related more to international politics.

Manuela Paraipan: How did it start?

Emile Lahoud: I was elected in 1998 and everyone wanted Rafiq Hariri to be the prime minister. I wanted that also. According to our constitution, we ask the members of parliament to come to the Presidential Palace to put forward the name of the prime minister. I helped them choose Prime Minister Hariri because he had very strong relations at the international level, and I thought this would be good for Lebanon.

When the members of parliament came with their proposals, Rafiq Hariri came and said that some MPs would like me to choose the prime minister. I said, fine. I choose you. There were maybe 86 votes for PM Hariri and 20 gave the votes to me, to give them to whomever I wanted, and I have gave them to Hariri. He refused to take the position. I was elected President with 117 out of 128 votes, and he also wanted to be elected with 117. I told him that he had been in power for six years already, and I said in French: “le pouvoir use.” When you get the power everyone is around you, but in time, a part of the support fades away. I told Hariri to think it over. It was Friday. I asked him to come back on Monday, and we would start. I was just elected and I wanted to start doing my job.

During the weekend, Hariri spoke on television and said that the president who had just been elected had wronged the Constitution. It was not right and everybody knew that. If he is accusing me from day one, I cannot work with him, and on Monday, I had to make a crucial decision, and it was the right one. If Hariri did not want the job, then I would ask Salim Hoss to take it. He is well known for his probity, and he is a national figure in the country....more

To continue this analysis/article please register here!


Register here for free

Print this article
Email

Password
forgot password?








NATO's new Strategic Concept
The Human Codes of Tolerance and Respect
 

Look for men and women of excellency, encourge them, foster them, and give them lasting support in every way.Cultivate and inspire elities in our democracies which do not simply enjoy privileges but are willing to assume social responsibilities.
 

The greatest danger confronting our world is moral relativism
 

We should not adopt but rather shape reality- networking a better and safer world with imagination.
 

Let`s start a new global progressive foreign policy to promote democratic developments and to get rid ...
 

Freedom is the foundation for knowledge, development, and progress. Powerful countries are developed because they are free.
 

Only a genuine reconciliation policy between societies can bring about a true and lasting peace and lay the foundations of eternal peace between former enemies.
 

Isolate the negative elements from the peaceful open-minded majority in the Islamic World.
 

We need a new NATO Double-Track decision consisting of two equally important columns:
military containment and an active dialog with the Islamic cultures.
 

For each conflict we need a holistic formula for peace based on diplomacy plus power plus reconciliation.
 

Beijing and the Pope gain from the establishment of diplomatic relations
 

Broader Middle East

Nations and societies in the "Broader Middle East" should overcome secular schism, seek a kind of enlightment and regain momentum to reach the exsellent scientific, moral and economic of the "Glory past".
 
Americas / USA

A new U.S. foreign policy is needed including: brilliant strategies, imagination and creativity, excellency ...
 
China

Beijing could recognize three advantages through new diplomatic relations with the Vatican
 
Europe

Give more power to the European Parliament, including the election of “European Government”.
 
India

Improve your governance and administration, fight corruption, wage more decentralisation and privatisation, improve your ecucation system.
 
Iran

Stop the development of Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
Iraq

Three Strong Federal States Comprised of Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis Are Needed Now in Iraq with a Division of Oil Income - or a Bloody Civil War Is Unavoidable
 
Islamic States

A New NATO Double-Track Decision on Terrorism and Dialogue with Islam Is Needed
 
Israel / Palestine

Israel, Palestine and its Arab neighbors need common values, interests and goals: Peace is possible !
 
NATO

For the European NATO countries it is intolerable to spend 61% what the US spends but only achieve 10% of the US power projection capacit. The issue is not to spend more but to spend in a way that produces real European power projection capabilities.
 
Koreas

Both countries should mitigate the tensions and aim for a re-unification as a free and democratic entity
 
Russia

Russia has to realize the vital importance of further democratic development. It has to revive its own democratic traditions.
 
Terror

Terrorism is a menace for mankind and should find a world wide coordinated response
 
Democracy

Don't ever ask "What's in for me?" Instead, ask "What is good for my country?"
 
Human Rights

Cuban dissidents should follow Estonia’s example of establishing a “Free Parliament” in exile with the support of the EU.
 
Peace and Conflict

We must welcome tolerant patriotism, while containing and combating nationalism and chauvinism.
 
Religion and Politics

The understanding that reconciliation heals memory is crucial for the achievement of true peace between ...
 
Tolerance

China should enhance individual freedoms, religious and cultural tolerance and protection of minorities.
 
UN

UN must adjust the Charter and the structure to the "new world"
 



© 2010 WorldSecurityNetwork | info@worldsecuritynetwork.com